Argument Construction - Terrorism - GCSE Religious …

The central argument here is the fact that when we over-react hysterically to the comparatively small damage inflicted by terrorists, we inflict far more damage on ourselves, both in petty inconvenience cost and in loss of liberty.

In this essay, Walzer talks about different reasons that people would want to resort to terrorism.

When Arafat addressed the General Assembly, he made the argument that the actions taken by his government were not acts of terrorism, but these were acts of revolution and their purpose was to regain control of Palestine’s occupied original territ...


Argument Construction - Terrorism

A bunch of commenters are saying that my essay ignores that terrorists have a political motivation.

You may begin your essay on terrorism with giving a definition you found in the Internet, for example: “Terrorism has been described variously as both a tactic and strategy; a crime and a holy duty; a justified reaction to oppression and an inexcusable abomination. Obviously, a lot depends on whose point of view is being represented. Terrorism has often been an effective tactic for the weaker side in a conflict.


Kylie Jenner revealed the name of her baby. Find out more!

In this essay I will argue Walzers view on Terrorism is correct in that terrorism is wrong because it is akin to murder, it is random in who it targets, and no one has immunity....

Fallacy | Definition of Fallacy by Merriam-Webster

To be sure, reasonable arguments can be made that some terrorist targets are more attractive than others: aeroplanes because a small bomb can result in the death of everyone aboard, monuments because of their national significance, national events because of television coverage, and transportation because of the numbers of people who commute daily. But there are literally millions of potential targets in any large country (there are five million commercial buildings alone in the US), and hundreds of potential terrorist tactics; it's impossible to defend every place against everything, and it's impossible to predict which tactic and target terrorists will try next.

Free Essays, Term Papers, Research Paper, and Book …

I wholeheartedly agree with almost all of the essay except for one point - the inclusion of the case of smoke alarm tampering on the list of false positives. MHO is that that guy should've been sent over to Guantanamo and lost there together with all evidence of his existence - the danger of an Air Canada 797-type disaster is very much real regardless of what terrorists want.

Dictatorships & Double Standards - Commentary …

I had written it off as an isolated incident which was Hollywood-ised. These recent (say, since 9/11) changes in policy and law have brought back memories. Especially because they didn't even bother to come up with a new name for the same disproportionally empowering law. Even if I give politicians that use terrorism as an argument the absolute benefit of the slightest doubt (i.e. I don't accuse them of specifically causing fear, or stimulating it) I still conclude they use it to find fall-guys. I'm just hoping they're not about to steal 30 years from innocent people again.