The rates I quote will be for VICTIMS unless I say otherwise.

Brown University supplement essay Yahoo Answers Brown University supplement essay Yahoo Answers middot Capital punishment argumentative Millicent Rogers Museum

In other essays I have discussed the dangers of death due to ,, ,and .

A graph on p.582 shows that since 1988 the 18-24 year age-group has accounted for the most murders in the US, followed by the 14-17 year age-group and then by the 25-34 year age-group.

Jamaica appears in the list reporting a dubious 2 murders for 1991.

So it therefore seems reasonable to begin by determining what some ofthe "wrong places" are.

Deterrence is most effective when the punishment happens soon after the crime - to make an analogy, a child learns not to put their finger in the fire, because the consequence is instant pain.

Resisting an assailant may not be futile and dangerous.

Many people don't think that this is sufficient justification for taking human life, and argue that there are other ways to ensure the offenders do not re-offend, such as imprisonment for life without possibility of parole.

The 1992 peak has been blamed on crack cocaine.

In the long run, if human lifespans begin tospan centuries, this would be the most crucial, since I believe that random,stupid, felonious and impulsive violence would decline sharply.

Handguns were used in about half of all murders.

But some people don't believe that life imprisonment without parole protects society adequately. The offender may no longer be a danger to the public, but he remains a danger to prison staff and other inmates. Execution would remove that danger.

There were no executions in the United Statesbetween 1967 and 1977.

CONCLUDING REMARKS A good piece of advice would seem to be, "Don't hang-around with(or marry-into) a bad crowd." That includes occupations that require associations with dangerous people, such as taxi-driving, liquor store workand police work, but it also includes country & city of residence.

Some people are prepared to as a concept, even when applied fairly.

Thomas Aquinas noted that by accepting the punishment of death, the offender was able to expiate his evil deeds and so escape punishment in the next life.

As executions rose, the murder rate declinedthrough the 1990s.

If this argument is true, then humanitarian abolitionists must reconcile the 100,000 lives of American homicide victims who might have survived the 1963-1997 period against the lives of murderers who were not executed.