Pasteur took the position that life was in the air, and that bacteria came from the air. Although Pasteur would deny that flesh could be alive independently of the organism that housed it, Charlton Bastian was producing experimental results that had no easy answer, particularly in light of Pasteur's germs-in-the-air evangelizing. Bastian found bacteria on the inside of animal organs and fruits and vegetables. Pasteur's air-germ theory did not account for them. In fact, Pasteur's air-germ theory misled scientists for some time. bought Pasteur's germs-in-the-air theory and sprayed his carbolic acid spray into the air around his patients, trying to kill those germs in the air. That led to many unnecessary deaths. Lister would later reject that idea and admit that the only germs of consequence were the ones introduced by "other than atmospheric sources."
From my point of view, if there are no other alternatives, and ifit is possible that this will contribute to science, animals may be used forexperimental research.
Should animals be used for experiments
- I need to say this again: Do not contribute to the horrors of puppymills!!! By buying a puppy or a dog from a pet store, you are contributing to thecruelty inflicted upon them at of puppymills, where dogs and puppies are kept inmost inhumane conditions! The suffering that the dogs endure, especiallythe ones used for breeding, is beyond comprehension. They spend all oftheir lives in smallwire cages, without even a minimum amount of proper veterinarian care; they aretreated with much cruelty, which often includes the gruesome procedure called"debarking" (the destruction of their vocal chords so that they can nolonger bark ); due to their horrible life quality, they often develop all kinds of diseases, includingmalnutrition, and sometimes develop physical deformities. These are just some ofthe examples of their suffering; tragically, there's much more to it. Toread the hard-to-believe-truth about what goes on in puppymills in the U.S.,click From the Doris Day Animal League website, here are suggestions of thingsyou can do, in addition to not buying puppies from pet shops, to help the causeagainst puppymills: click
Should animal testing be banned
Pasteur ventured into outright human experimentation and used his rabies treatment on humans before he had used it on animals. His private notebooks yielded that finding, but it comes as no surprise to those who have read a letter that Pasteur wrote to the emperor of Brazil. In 1884, Pasteur wrote that people condemned to death should become subjects of human experiments and given the option on the eve of their planned executions. The choice presented would be execution or becoming subjects for rabies vaccine testing. Pasteur predicted that the condemned would all consent to becoming experimental subjects, as a person condemned to death only fears death. Pasteur performed his experiments on his patients after he wrote his letter to the Brazilian emperor. Patrice Debré, who authored a sympathetic biography of Pasteur, wrote that one could not read Pasteurs letter to the emperor without thinking of the Nazis death-camp experiments. Even one of Pasteur's disciples said about Pasteur's human rabies experiments, "The scientist's conscience smothered the conscience of the man."
Save Animals Essay - 1249 Words - StudyMode
8 Although I accept that some drugs can be used on animals and humans, this does not mean that they have to be tested on animals in the first place when alternative methods are available. Alternative methods do work. Various groups have been set up to put money into other ways of researching. For example the Dr. Hadwen Trust has shown how human cartilage can be grown in test tubes to study rheumatism. Similar research is being done into cancer and multiple sclerosis. Tests can be done on bacteria to see whether a chemical will cause cancer. There is even a programme of volunteer human researchers, where people suffering from illnesses offer to help in research.