Feminists, who complain about certain professions or venues being "pink ghettos," are doing their determined best to see to it that college becomes such a place.
Our goal here is not to survey the history of feminism — as aset of ideas or as a series of political movements — but ratheris to sketch some of the central uses of the term that are mostrelevant to those interested in contemporary feminist philosophy. Thereferences we provide below are only a small sample of the workavailable on the topics in question; more complete bibliographies areavailable at the specific topical entries and also at the end of thisentry.
Effects of Feminism: Cause and Effect Essay - …
Our culture has been influenced enough by Anton LaVey and his books so that it's now cool for young women to dress like Satanic witches and think like the Devil Himself. Camille Paglia and others now get honorifics for challenging traditional feminism, defending women's rights to wear heels and makeup. Those who study such trends are calling this "lipstick feminism" (from the more honest "lipstick lesbians"), "nontraditional feminism" or "antifeminist feminism." Big news. So came out 26 years ago, girls. Did you just get around to reading it? To me, it's still the same old game of cribbing from Anton LaVey's books, catering to the new Satanic generation, but not wanting to acknowledge those blasphemous philosophical roots. Jayne Mansfield recognized that, for the first time in her life, she had found a philosophy through which she could be a businesswoman, an intellectual, a mother and a sexpot all at once. She wouldn't be criticized for committing the ultimate sin of reconciling irreconcilables.
Download What is Feminism? Book by Chris Beasley Free Downlo
the Islamic Society -- an act whose strangeness can only be explained as [Feminism?], with heavy infusions of victims' mentality.Amanda Foreman, "Five Best: A Personal Choice," , April 2-3, 2016, C10, color added
Topics in Feminism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
An alternative, however, would be to grant that in practice unityamong feminists cannot be taken for granted, but to begin with atheoretical common-ground among feminist views that does not assumethat sexism appears in the same form or for the same reasons in allcontexts. We saw above that one promising strategy for distinguishingsexism from racism, classism, and other forms of injustice is to focuson the idea that if an individual is suffering sexist oppression, thenan important part of the explanation why she is subject to theinjustice is that she is or appears to be a woman. This includes casesin which women as a group are explicitly targeted by a policy or apractice, but also includes cases where the policy or practice affectswomen due to a history of sexism, even if they are not explicitlytargeted. For example, if women are deprived an education and so are,on the whole, illiterate. And if under these circumstances only thosewho are literate are entitled to vote. Then we can say that women as agroup are being disenfranchised and that this is a form of sexistoppression because part of the explanation of why women cannot vote isthat they are women, and women are deprived an education. Thecommonality among the cases is to be found in the role of gender inthe explanation of the injustice rather than the specific form theinjustice takes. Building on this we could unify a broad range offeminist views by seeing them as committed to the (very abstract)claims that:
Why More Black Men Must Be Feminists - EBONY
hooks' approach depends on the claim that sexism is a particular formof oppression that can be distinguished from other forms, e.g., racismand homophobia, even though it is currently (and virtually always)interlocked with other forms of oppression. Feminism's objective is toend sexism, though because of its relation to other forms ofoppression, this will require efforts to end other forms of oppressionas well. For example, feminists who themselves remain racists will notbe able to fully appreciate the broad impact of sexism on the lives ofwomen of color. Furthermore because sexist institutions are also,e.g., racist, classist and homophobic, dismantling sexist institutionswill require that we dismantle the other forms of dominationintertwined with them (Heldke and O'Connor 2004). Following hooks'lead, we might characterize feminism schematically (allowing theschema to be filled in differently by different accounts) as the viewthat women are subject to sexist oppression and that this iswrong. This move shifts the burden of our inquiry from acharacterization of what feminism is to a characterization of whatsexism, or sexist oppression is.